Controversies in Psychology

Edited by Andrew M. Colman

1995, London and New York: Longman. Pp. xvi + 105. ISBN 0-582-27803-1


Contents

Notes on editor and contributors

Series editor's preface

Introduction

1    Parapsychology

            Susan Blackmore University of the West of England, England

2    Hypnosis

            Graham F. Wagstaff University of Liverpool, England

3    Gender Issues in Psychology

            Mary Crawford West Chester University, USA and Rhoda K. Unger Montclair State College, USA

4    Psychology and the Law

            Robert T. Croyle University of Utah, USA and Elizabeth F. Loftus University of Washington, USA

5    Health Psychology

            John Weinman Guy's Hospital, England

Glossary

Index

 
Introduction

Andrew M. Colman

This book deals with issues that arouse debate, argument, and controversy, not only within the psychological community but also in the public arena. In addition to being controversial, they are topics that students find especially intriguing, and they are therefore popular topics for seminars and discussion groups. Students and general readers alike seem to be attracted to books that focus on controversial issues. Controversies in psychology are not only interesting but also highly instructive, because they clearly expose the reasoning processes and research methodologies that lie behind the psychologists' conclusions. As the philosopher of science Karl Popper argued persuasively (see, for example, Popper, 1972), ideas that have withstood vigorous criticism are generally preferable to those that have been accepted uncritically or dogmatically, because the process of criticism exposes errors that can then be eliminated. It is worth adding that criticism also tends to cause the underlying ideas to be expressed more clearly and therefore to be better understood.
   
There is another significant property shared by the topics covered in this volume. They are all difficult to classify within the conventional course modules of the standard undergraduate curriculum, as represented by the titles of the other books in this series, namely Cognitive Psychology, Developmental Psychology, Social Psychology, and so on. In spite of the difficulty of classifying them, the topics discussed in the following chapters are all related to research problems of sufficient importance to have attracted sustained research, and they tend to be taught in degree courses under a variety of different headings, including "Special Topics" and "Options".
   
In chapter 1, Susan Blackmore provides a critical survey of research into parapsychology. The word itself comes from the Greek para, which means beyond, prefixed to the word psychology. Parapsychology is a small but well established and active field of research devoted to the investigation of psychological phenomena that purport to be paranormal, to use a more familiar word, supernatural. Blackmore traces the historical background of parapsychology (for a more detailed historical survey see Beloff, 1994) and then evaluates the scientific evidence regarding a number of possibly paranormal phenomena, including ESP (extra-sensory perception: perception without the use of normal sensory processes), PK (psychokinesis: the movement or change of physical objects by purely mental processes), psychic experiences, out-of-body experiences, and survival after death.
   
It is only through properly controlled scientific investigations that the reality of such phenomena can be established convincingly. There is an abundance of non-scientific, anecdotal evidence for spontaneous paranormal phenomena, or psi phenomena as they are often inelegantly called (from the Greek letter psi, representing psyche, soul, and psychical, spiritual). We have all heard accounts of psi experiences from relatives, friends, and acquaintances, and early psychical research was devoted largely to collecting and examining just such accounts as these. But anecdotal evidence of this kind relies on the testimony of those who report it, and more than two centuries ago the Scottish philosopher David Hume (1748/1902, section 10) put forward a decisive argument against accepting such reports. He pointed out that an anecdotal report of an allegedly paranormal event (or of anything else, for that matter) always entails exactly three logical possibilities: either the report is true, or it is false because the informant is mistaken, or it is false because the informant is lying. Now if an informant reports something that is supposed to be true but is intrinsically unlikely, then the crucial question is whether one of the alternatives, namely that the informant is mistaken or lying, is even less likely. The answer always has to be no: a paranormal event must have violated a law of nature and must therefore be as unlikely as anything could be, because if it did not violate any law of nature, then the claim that it was paranormal would collapse. It follows from this that the likelihood that the informant is mistaken or lying must be greater, because that would not violate any law of nature. Consequently, there are never good grounds for believing merely anecdotal accounts of paranormal phenomena. Perhaps surprisingly, Hume's argument also applies, with minor modifications, to a belief that one has experienced a paranormal event at first hand, because even the testimony of one's own senses can be mistaken without violating any law of nature (Mackie, 1982, chap. 1). Because anecdotal evidence is unpersuasive, paranormal phenomena must be investigated through properly controlled scientific experiments of the type discussed by Blackmore in chapter 1.
   
In chapter 2, Graham F. Wagstaff discusses hypnosis and the controversy surrounding the interpretation of various strange phenomena associated with it. The controversy over credulous versus sceptical interpretations of hypnotic phenomena, as they have come to be called, can be traced to France in 1784. The King of France at that time appointed a scientific commission to investigate the practice of animal magnetism by the Viennese physician Franz Anton Mesmer. The controversy over the interpretation of hypnotic phenomena is perhaps the longest-running debate in the whole history of psychology. Hypnosis never fully recovered from the debunking of Mesmer's theories, although the phenomena of hypnosis really have nothing to do with animal magnetism or with Mesmer's curative methods. Hypnosis's reputation in the popular imagination was further damaged by George Du Maurier's influential novel, Trilby, which was published in 1894 and made into a popular film by Archie Mayo in 1931. The story is about a young model called Trilby O'Farral, groomed as a singer by a sinister and overbearing hypnotist called Svengali, who exerts almost supernatural powers over her and deprives her of all ability to think and act for herself. Wagstaff's chapter shows that this image of hypnosis could hardly be further from the truth. Although a great deal is now known about hypnosis, the debate over its interpretation remains tantalizingly unresolved.
   
Wagstaff deals critically with the debate about whether or not hypnosis is (or entails) an altered state of consciousness. He then goes on to discuss the physiology of hypnosis, its apparently transcendent properties, and its major phenomena, including trance logic (the peculiar willingness of hypnotized subjects to tolerate certain kinds of logical inconsistencies), hypnotic amnesia, hypnotic analgesia, and hypnotic susceptibility. He concludes with a brief discussion of clinical applications of hypnosis and susceptibility to hypnosis. According to the sceptical interpretation, with which Wagstaff is generally sympathetic, all hypnotic phenomena can be explained without assuming any special state of consciousness. The phenomenon of hypnotic analgesia presents perhaps the most severe challenge to this interpretation, but Wagstaff argues that even the established ability of susceptible hypnotic subjects to undergo major surgery without anaesthetics can be explained without invoking any special hypnotic state. For a more detailed (and more credulous) account of hypnotic analgesia, see Hilgard and Hilgard (1994). Hypnosis has occasionally been applied in an attempt to obtain more or better evidence from witnesses in criminal trials; research in that area is discussed in chapter 4 in connection with psychology and the law (see below).
   
Chapter 3, by Mary Crawford and Rhoda K. Unger, contains a detailed survey of various lines of research related to gender issues in psychology. This has been an active field of psychological research and debate since the emergence of feminist thinking in psychology during the 1970s. Many contemporary authorities in this field, including the authors of this chapter, draw a distinction between sex differences and gender differences. According to this view, sex differences are the genetically determined biological differences between male and female, whereas gender differences are the differences arising from psychological, social, and cultural influences acting on biological sex differences. This chapter first examines a number of conceptual and methodological issues surrounding gender-related research. It then focuses on gender and development throughout the lifespan, what the authors call "doing gender" (the way in which people's preconceptions based on sex differences affect gender-characteristic patterns of interpersonal interaction, such as self-presentational strategies and interactions between people of different status), and finally sexuality and relationships in sociocultural context. More extended discussions of gender issues in psychology can be found in the further reading recommended by Crawford and Unger and in Doyle and Paludi's (1995) book, Sex and Gender: The Human Experience.
   
In chapter 4, Robert T. Croyle and Elizabeth F. Loftus survey all major aspects of psychology and the law. Most of the research in this area has concentrated on aspects of criminal trials, especially factors affecting the validity of eyewitness testimony and psychological processes in jury decision making. However, a considerable amount of research attention has also been paid to psychological aspects of sentencing and general treatment of convicted criminals. Croyle and Loftus's chapter provides a review of research in these and other fields of investigation broadly related to psychology and the law. As might be expected, many aspects of psychology and the law are highly controversial. For readers who wish to delve further into these issues, the Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts (1995) and the books by Bartol and Bartol (1994) and by Wrightsman, Nietzel, and Fortune (1994) may be useful, in addition to Croyle and Loftus's suggested further reading.
   
The last chapter in this volume is chapter 5, by John Weinman, on health psychology. This area of research relates to psychological factors in the promotion and maintenance of health, the prevention and treatment of illness, and the identification of psychological causes and correlates of all forms of health and illness. Chapter 5 covers various aspects of research in health psychology, including the controversial relationship between stress and health, the effects of differing lifestyles on health, coping strategies and the role of social support among people suffering from chronic illnesses, psychological responses to medical investigations and treatments, and, at a more theoretical level, various explanations that have been put forward to explain health-related behaviour. Further information on these and other issues in health psychology is contained Weinman's suggested further reading and in the books by Stroebe and Stroebe (1995) and Taylor (1995).
   
Gender differences in health and illness have been reliably established, although neither chapter 5 (on health psychology) nor chapter 3 (on gender issues in psychology) discuss them in any detail. As an example, the evidence is overwhelming that in western industrial societies -- and perhaps in others as well -- women are significantly more prone to depression than men. Research evidence suggests that this may be due to gender differences in coping styles. In a detailed review of gender differences in depression, Nolen-Hoeksema (1987) concluded that regardless of whether the depression is biological, psychological, or social in origin, women tend to ruminate significantly more than men -- in other words, they tend to spend more time mulling over their problems. In contrast, men tend to distract themselves more than women do, which may in some circumstances be a more effective strategy for coping with depression. This line of research suggests that gender differences in depression, and perhaps in other mental disorders as well, may be due to differences between the coping styles and strategies of men and women.
   
In spite of the compact size of this volume, the range of subject matter contained within it is wide and varied. Readers who wish to pursue any of the topics in depth are strongly urged to follow the suggestions for further reading at the end of each chapter and perhaps also the additional suggestions contained in this introduction.

REFERENCES

Bartol, C. R., & Bartol, A. M. (1994). Psychology and the law: Research and application (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Beloff, J. (1994). Parapsychology: A concise history. New York: St Martin's Press.

Doyle, J. A., & Paludi, M. A. (1995). Sex and gender: The human experience (3rd ed.). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.

Handbook of psychology in legal contexts. (1995). New York: Wiley.

Hilgard, E. R., & Hilgard, J. R. (1994). Hypnosis in the relief of pain (rev. ed.). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

Hume, D. (1902). Enquiry concerning human understanding (L. A. Selby-Bigge, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1748)

Mackie, J. L. (1982). The miracle of theism: Arguments for and against the existence of god. Oxford: Clarendon.

Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1987). Sex differences in unipolar depression: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 259-282.

Popper, K. R. (1972). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge (4th ed.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Stroebe, W., & Stroebe, M. S. (1995). Social psychology and health. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Taylor, S. (1995). Health psychology (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Wrightsman, L. S., Nietzel, M. T., & Fortune, W. H. (1994). Psychology and the legal system (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

 

<back to Andrew Colman’s personal home page>